Comments on: Time tourism

By: Stuart Ian Burns

Stuart Ian Burns — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:42:17 +0000

Let’s go to Golgotha. Then again, on second thoughts …

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let‘s_go_to_Golgotha

By: Angela

Angela — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:07:58 +0000

..but my face would be melted off…

By: Angela

Angela — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:24:26 +0000

1715, North Lincolnshire, Barrow upon Humber

Room and board in exchange for work as John Harrison’s apprentice.

But only if I can come back.

By: Meg

Meg — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:52:44 +0000

Thanks for all the ideas so far. Some really excellent thoughts!

Sorry for imposing the 200 year rule, but you wouldn’t want your face to melt off, would you?

I’ve been pondering further about the time holiday overcrowding issue and about how many people would want to witness the same events – in much the same way as when people claim to have had a past life, they’re always Cleopatra or Oliver Cromwell, and never a small child from Dunoon who died of consumption before they hit the age of five.

So I think the best package experiences might be epochal rather than eventful.

By: Cliff

Cliff — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:42:41 +0000

I’d choose the French Riviera around the time of Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald and dancer Isadora Duncan, although the self aggrandicement might make me want to punch someone after a bit.

Or Liverpool of the 1910′s, but I’d probably get punched.

Shanghai of the 1930′s would be awesome, too. Or New York in the pre-war bebop era.

I will be thinking about this all day now. Great post.

The 200 year rule JUST rules out Benjamin Franklin’s Philadelphia of the 1770s when it was the second largest English speaking city in the world.

By: lomokev

lomokev — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:52:43 +0000

it would have to be going back to england 1988 to take part in the second summer of love. all those big illegal raves with happy smiley people. unfortunately i was only 11 at the time so could not take part in the all the fun

By: Paul Mison

Paul Mison — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:36:52 +0000

Oh, along the lines the conversation seems to have taken: New York World’s Fair, 1939? Or the Montreal Expo in 1967? Even the Festival of Britain in 1951; who doesn’t love a bit of Skylon?

By: Sam

Sam — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:21:23 +0000

I was going to say the Great Exhibition in London – I’d love to see the Crystal Palace. I’d also love to see the Houses of Parliament as they’re being built.

Paris of the 1880s – I’d visit the new Eiffel Tower and hang out with some Impressionists, otherwise I’d want a trip on the Hindenburg across the Atlantic in say around 1935, after a wee stay in Berlin just to see what all the fuss was about.

I’d also like to go to the French Riviera in the late 60s/early 70s and spend some time in Nice/watch the Monaco Grand Prix. Fun times.

By: Sarah

Sarah — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:13:51 +0000

1920s Berlin perhaps? My own great preference for being inconspicuous might preclude me from enjoying time tourism though.

By: rodcorp

rodcorp — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:15:04 +0000

Nick, that time-tourist-despoiliation was the scenario of ‘Vintage Season’, a 40s/50s story by husband and wife team Kuttner and Moore.

Great Exhibition, yes! New York 1913, Armory Show, Duchamp! Dublin/Trieste 1922, Joyce!

By: nick s

nick s — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:47:53 +0000

Only 200 years? Bang goes London, 1728 or Edinburgh in the 1760s. So let’s make it London, 1922 instead.

Trouble with “time holidays” is that you assume you’ll have access to all the worthies and sit in on all the notable events, but all those spaces will be booked out well in advance, while the time backpackers will be complaining that it’s all too touristy and spoiled these days. No point paying big coin to be part of an emerging subculture if it’s packed to the gills with gawkers from the future having their photos taken with Allen Ginsberg.

The best way around that is to focus on events where things are a bit less exclusive. So rodcorp’s got the right idea, and I’ll throw in a package to London, 1851 for the Great Exhibition.

By: rodcorp

rodcorp — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:58:52 +0000

Paris in 1863 for the Salon des Refusés and the birth of modern art.

By: Paul Mison

Paul Mison — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:58:32 +0000

While I have my own reasons for visiting 1960s London, if I were to be stranded in time I’d probably pick around 1890. I’d get to see the tube boom (as in, the construction programme, not it going bang), the tail end of Queen Victoria’s reign, and when it came time for the Great War, I’d be too old to be drafted. Think of the technology changing, too. As a tourist, I’d probably go for the tail end of that period; 1910 or so, the peak of the British Empire (for better or worse).

What about Brighton in 1820s, as King George VI is turning it from a fishing village into his pleasure palace? Not really my cup of tea, but it’s a thought. The Americas, while the natives were still in charge? How about picking a really good historic aurora and watching it? I gather there was a very big storm in the 1850s.