May 13, 2009
Game Web 2.Over?
This collage of web 2.0 logos should be pretty familiar to many people by now. It’s been knocking about for a few years, ever since the whole Web 2.0 Koolaid (what’s the British equivalent? Ribena?) started flowing.
During that time, I’ve seen it printed out and stuck up on the walls of companies and individuals, appearing in about a million blogs, and it should almost go without saying that this image gets used endlessly in presentations at events about the social web, or web 2.0 technologies, or the changing face of business in the last few years, or design and UX in the new web.
In that context, it is usually accompanied by sentiments like “Web 2.0 isn’t going anywhere” or “the social web is real and growing” – using the sheer quantity of Web 2.0-type offerings starting up in 2005ish as an indication of how much they were shaking things up and changing the game. Dare I even say shifting the paradigm? ;)
Anyway, having been professionally involved in one of the companies featured on the original logo collage, an avid user of a handful of others and a casual user (OK, I registered a username) for a whole bunch more, I’m as aware that the web 2.0 landscape has changed as you are.
So having recently been confronted with this image in a presentation (used as being indicative of current reality), I thought it was time that it was updated.
I present these updates without reference to or predicting the demise of web 2.0 or social technologies or anything like that. Just to be a bit more accurate.
The image below reflects which of this original set of companies have vanished or ceased trading, via the highly scientific method of searching for their names and clicking about until I could find reliable information about them.
The most reliable method seemed to be to go to the original Techcrunch (or mashable) hyping of the new service in 2005ish, and then follow the link to the company. If the link is kaput, then so is the company.
More than you thought? Or less? Certainly some of the daft names (and business models, and ideas) have dried up, but others remain, and still more have sprung up in their place, no doubt.
It’s also worth noting that there are a handful of others listed as alive on this diagram (or rather, not crossed out) which are, to put it politely, dormant or dwindling if not actually dead.
And this image reveals which (to the best of my knowledge or research) have been successfully bought by other companies, though some, like XDrive, have been terminal in spite (or perhaps because) of being bought by a larger company.
Here are the two bits of updated information together on one image.
(I’m aware that there’s also a longer version of this image featuring a host of additional companies. I’ll try and update the details for the longer list when I get a chance.)
Please let me know if I’ve missed or misclassified any.
Update: Four additional things you should know about this work:
- This image is an update of a well-known earlier work which was created in 2006.
- I have updated the image for the sake of accuracy, and not to call fail on Web 2.0. This is similar to redrawing a map which features Prussia – an interesting historical artefact, but you wouldn’t want to navigate by it.
- The original creator of the web 2.0 logo collage made the decision about which companies to include or exclude, based on his own criteria (which I don’t know, but could be success, buzz, logo design or something else).
- Because of this, it should be completely obvious that this list of companies wasn’t comprehensive at the time (there were many more web 2.0 startups at the time that weren’t featured) and isn’t now (there are hundreds of exciting and successful startups which have launched since 2006 and which aren’t featured). Many things on the internet are subjective and selective. The original collage was one. If your/favourite company isn’t featured above, sorry; this is why.
If anyone would like to make a new collage of startups in this genre for 2009, I’d be very interested to see it – please post the link in the comments. Here’s the collage above, but with all the defunct companies removed:
There are plenty of healthy and exciting companies around these days which could fill those empty spaces. Who’ll take on the task of filling the gaps?
Absolutely, Mike – and as I’ve said above several times, this post isn’t at all about bagging on Web 2.0 startups. I just don’t like seeing an out of date image used.
In fact, if you removed all the ones who didn’t make it, you could amply fill the gaps with dozens of newer startups – like Twitter!
Also, thanks for using a contemporary, accurate image in your presentations. Accuracy makes a much more compelling case for the web as serious business, while using outdated references in such a fast-moving industry makes everyone look a bit silly.
It would be interesting to build this image in a Wiki-style web site, where anybody can add and update the status of logos, and the site will automatically rebuild the map.
[...] This post was Twitted by jackschofield – Real-url.org [...]
@Eliezer: check out http://www.go2web20.net/
[...] foto original con las compañías que se mantienen y las que han cerrado. Vía Mashable. El link a meish.org que discute esto. Decididamente, la crisis económica tiene mucho que ver con estos cierres. Y [...]
[...] what happened to these companies after like 3-4 years? Here is an interesting story by Meg Pickard. She has compiled an updated collage where dead companies are marked with red X mark and [...]
[...] was reading the article Game Web 2.Over? published on meish.org. It was about what’s currently going on with the social web. And it [...]
[...] More details on my blog: Game Web 2.Over? [...]
[...] a really interesting post over at Meish.org with a great graphical example of the various web apps that have gone under. Here’s the [...]
[...] Game Web 2.0 Over? – Picture Credits: Meg Pickard & Stabilo Boss [via] [...]
[...] » Game Web 2.Over? [...]
Hi,
nice work. I did a similar analysis for German startups:
http://michaelmarth.blogspot.com/2008/08/germanys-most-anticipated-web-20-sites.html
(though yours is about 1000% more visually appealing :) )
[...] ??????? ????????? ???? ????? ??? Web 2.0. ??????????? ??? ?????? ??? Meg [...]
I created one of the projects Xed out on the first chart. Looking back it was a project and not a business – I got coverage on all the hot tech blogs and the associated huge spike in traffic but there really was not a business there. It did help me get my next job though and it was a fun ride.
[...] for everyone to see and hopefully cast your opinions. The conversation originally started with Meg Pickards post on her blog with a somewhat negative view on the potential of social media startups in [...]
[...] game of noughts and crosses, this image (courtesy of another social media expert, Meg Pickard from meish.org) represents the vast majority of Web 2.0 companies in the last three or so years, with their [...]
[...] Pickard ?????????Game Web 2.Over? [...]
[...] > Read the full post [...]
[...] Mashable kicked around the idea presented by blogger and social media specialist, Meg Pickard, that most web 2.0 companies FAIL. In fact, that was the title of their article. Their reasoning? The picture below. The X’s [...]
[...] web 2.0 logo collage re-imagined – The ubiquitous web 2.0 / social web startups logo montage needs an update: this graphic demonstrates those companies that fell, and those that have been bought up by larger organisations. [...]
[...] Game Web 2.Over? – meish dot org: life, unfolding [...]
Meg,
Great article, it’s very interesting to see who has succeeded and who hasn’t. I thought you might be interested to know that I posted a followup article that quantifies the success and failure rates of the web startup companies (~200 companies) referred to within the logo collage above. I would love to get in your thoughts about it. Again great article, thank for sharing it with us.
A fascinating article, which does show that there are still plenty of web absed companies performing well after several years. I would have expected many more than illustrated to have gone by the wayside.
Very informative, thank you!
[...] Web 2.0 – Game Over. Un articol desptul de inteeresant – aici (engl) [...]
Actually, I’m surprised Twitter isn’t on there. I suppose it’s a newer phenomenon, but it’s probably the darling of modern social media.
I was surprised to see Wikipedia on there. I suppose it fits the criteria, but it just seems so stodgy and informational that it couldn’t be on the same poster as all the hip, cool sites.
Also, I noticed that Pegasus has two circles. Is one of those for Facebook?
[...] Meg Pickard released an updated version of the now infamous Web 2.0 image map. This new map breaks down who is [...]
Hey Meg,
I thought you would be interested to know that I have compiled a Web 3.0 logo collage to track the success/failure of semantic web internet startups. Currently I have a list of 50 of them total. If you think I’ve left any out, let me know please.
Oops, sorry Meg, I forgot the link to the new collage of Web 3.0 startups I created.
Here you go:
http://tomuse.com/tracking-web-30-startup-semantic-web-stats
Your input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
[...] How many “Web 2.0″ era companies have failed to date Game Web 2.Over? [...]