meish dot org: life, unfolding

Icon

This is a blog by Meg Pickard. YMMV.
Hit the duck to be whisked to a random post

All photos »   Fire-alarm-induced evacuation of Guardian Towers Found while clearing out my old work laptop Just visible: Tinchy Stryder throwing shapes in the studio Happy Lime Looking down On the journey home Meg is trying (and failing) to concentrate "trying" Love means...   

The Polite Amount

Ever been to the fridge and discovered that there’s a milk carton there but with only the puniest dribble of cow-juice left in it, not even enough to soften a thimble of tea?

You, my friend, are a victim of that scourge of society, the curse of the polite amount.

Basically, the polite amount is the smallest amount of foodstuff a person can leave without actually finishing it off completely. This usually applies to foodstuffs consumed between people or in a social context.

It could be a splash of milk.
A scrape of butter.
A single, solitary bar snack.

You’ve all been there: sitting in a pub with friends, a solo crisp or dry-roasted peanut gazing up in a lonely way from the bowl or the splayed silver bag innards on the table, with your friends stealing guilty/frustrated/longing glances at it because no matter how hungry, no-one wants to be The Finisher: the one who polishes it off.

The last chilli puff

You know it when you see it:

  • A single chocolate, left in the box.
  • A sad biscuit at the bottom of a gaping tin.
  • A dice-sized chunk of cheddar.
  • A solo slice of bread. And it’s the heel.
  • Not enough coffee to make a difference.
  • A portion of rice that would make UN emergency rations look generous.
  • Half a teaspoon of pesto.
  • The last spring roll when there’s an even number of you and the dish contained five.
  • Twenty-eight cornflakes, huddled at the bottom of the promising cavern of their box, on top of the fridge.

The issue of polite amounts arises from one of two sources:

a) generosity of spirit and
b) laziness and/or cheapness.


Despite being seemingly opposed, both motivations can create the same results: crushing disappointment and seemingly endless pettiness.

The generosity of spirit argument usually occurs when someone doesn’t want to finish something off. You know the situation - you want to leave something for the next person, because being The Finisher would be bad: it would seem inconsiderate of others.

The laziness/cheapness argument reads the same: you don’t want to finish something off, you want to leave something for the next person, because being The Finisher would be bad - only THIS time, it’s driven by the reasoning that it would be bad because the person who finishes a thing needs to wash it up OR buy a replacement. So you justify in your head that it’s OK not to throw away the cereal box (or even buy more cereal) because there was still some left, even if you’d have to be one of The Borrowers to truly appreciate it.

This leads to stubborn standoffs which can involve flatmates (or couples, even) dividing a remaining portion of pasta salad in half, then half again, then again, until there is only a single farfalle, a cube of chopped pepper and a cherry tomato left, in order to avoid having to wash the bowl it was contained in - and all the while ready with a defence of innocence which insists that “there was still some left and I didn’t know if you wanted any.”

So after years of experiencing this in shared flats and with friends when out, my flatmate C and I when living in Bolivia together had only one house rule: No Polite Amounts. Evah.

This meant that if you made a cup of tea, and there wasn’t much milk left (enough for one cup, but not for two), then according to the law, it was better to use it up completely than to put a pathetic ooze back in the fridge which might fool the next tea-hunter into thinking that there would be a nice cuppa in hand soon enough, only to discover at the point of insertion that the amount left in the carton wasn’t in fact enough to flavour even the tiniest shot of tea. By simply finishing it off completely - even if that meant overmilky tea - the disappointment of the one who follows could be easily avoided.

The rule was surprisingly effective: it made us more considerate, and made the fridge much more manageable. It lessened the number of spats in the house. And it provided a useful primer for later life, and one which I encourage you to adopt.

So I say: down with polite amounts. Say no to the curse of leaving a little bit. Finish up with pride - and then do your fucking duty and replace it or wash up, if that’s what’s required.

It’s a small price to pay for a happy social or domestic life, I’m telling you.

Bookmark and Share

Category: Life, Rants

Tagged:

7 Responses

  1. Vicky says:

    Your last two posts have made me wish you ruled the world :)

  2. Sameer Vasta says:

    I’ll second Vicky’s comment. I’d vote for you for President.

  3. mac says:

    Oh, I just grab and eat, I have an inability to leave food, thats an equal problem.

  4. GazH says:

    Our work office mini fridge suffers from this a lot although the exception is now the emergency injectapen of insulin, full, I think. Polite amount of insulin >3mls.

  5. Karen says:

    brilliant! you should write a book…

  6. drew says:

    We call the last slice of pizza the ‘guilt’ slice. And we call it, saying “I’m taking the guilt slice” which, strangely, makes you feel rather guilt free.
    In the latter category, I often don’t want to finish the jar of pesto because it somehow seems old and therefore off. It’s like when you get down to the last scrape of Vegemite, it’s 50% specs of butter and toast crumbs by that stage, which is… eww.

  7. acadia says:

    I once had a roommate who would cut the last piece of cake in such a way that a thin line would be left. It would be the thickness of a hardbound book cover and I cannot for the life of me figure how she did it, nor how it stayed standing upright. She would also break the last cookie in half.

By way of explanation...

This is an individual post, which may not be very recent. For the latest stuff on meish dot org, please visit the main page.

By the way, I'm female. It doesn't have much impact on what I write about, or how I write, but I thought I'd point it out because so many people who link to this site seem to assume I'm male.

The clue's in the name: Meg. Like all those other female Megs.

Categories

What's all this, then?

This is a personal site, created and curated continuously since early 2000 by Meg Pickard, a creative geek, passionate photographer, anthropologist and web experience /community /social media specialist, who works for The Guardian & lives in London, UK.
 
The site includes a blog - a personal and evolving collection of links, opinions, thoughts, ideas, anecdotes and musings - as well as a variety of other projects. It is also a place to aggregate some of the author's distributed web activity, like photos, links and music.
 
More info about this site and its author.

Important note #1

This is a personal site. The contents and opinions contained within don't necessarily reflect those of my employer, family, or cat. They think for themselves (though mostly about tuna, in at least one case), and so do I.

Important note #2

Since the overwhelming majority of content on this site is historical, it should be regarded in light of the context in which it was originally published, and not as indicative or revealing of current perspectives, preferences or experience.

Important note #3

While I work and spend a lot of time thinking and talking about social media, participatory technologies and community development strategies, the vast majority of content on this site is not about that.

This personal site isn't about anything, except the perpetual unfolding of one person's experience, and the perspectives, observations and opinions that involves and inspires.

You still here?

Oh.