File under: Friends, Life, Reflections, Society & Media, Web, Work

And speaking of names

I’m on several mailing lists at my company which give details of server maintenance outages and the like. And most of the time, they fly through the inbox and I can happily ignore them.

However, yesterday there were a flurry of mails with priceless subject lines:

leprechaun2.png

I loved the idea that they needed to take all the little green Irish fellas out of service to give them new green trousers, or because the pot of gold was broken or something.

However, I’m sure that our colleagues in the US just thought about it as a server name - because that’s what happens, isn’t it? We give things names and the words - the names - themselves lose meaning as real words, and become forever associated with the thing we have names.

So my cat is called Pickle - but when I think of her name I don’t think of Branston anymore, I think “small brown cat with kittenish tendancies”.

<gratuitous picture of my cat>

</gratuitous picture of my cat>

And when (back in the heady days of the first dotcom boom) we used to have a meeting room at work called “Cyberspace” (I know, I know), we would inevitably end up mystifying visitors and newbies by saying “we’re meeting in Cyberspace” or “Oh no, I think I left my notepad in Cyberspace”. The word became meaningless (well, in that case, more meaningless) and described only the room.

Likewise, people’s names become attached to them, and stop being names after a while, becoming instead individual-descriptors. I’m probably the only Meg most people know, so for them, Meg = me, this individual. However, I know several Iains, Johns, Toms, Matts, Pauls and people called Chris (what’s the plural anyway?) so the relationship between name & person becomes less strong - and inevitably, we end up resorting to nicknames.

Perhaps this is why I’ve never really had a nickname - perhaps Meg is unique enough?

Do you have a nickname? What is it?

More on nicknames.
Big evolving list of nicknames.

13 Comments