meish dot org: life, unfolding

Icon

This is a blog by Meg Pickard. YMMV.
Hit the duck to be whisked to a random post

All photos » Is there any such thing as "too stripy"? I don't think so. High   We went for a long walk. Well, I did the walking; Erin mainly looked after the napping end of things The least terrifying hoodie in London We both need a nap Two months old today Un entente cordial Happy bee Surrounded Work in progress I misread this: interchanged 'monk' and 'child' 

Business-Speak Daftness

There are two phrases I hear a lot in the course of my work, which tickle me in some small way. I don’t think they’re perculiar to my workplace or industry, but they certainly seem to be increasing in frequency and breadth over the last few months. I’m as guilty as anyone else of using them, and I wonder if anyone reading this has any experience of them out in the wilds of your workplaces. Do tell…
The first is used when trying to get a little face-time with someone (no, that’s not the phrase, though it’s bad enough in its own way.) I regularly hear people asking:

“Can we sit down later and discuss X?”

or

“Let’s find some time to sit down this week”

or

“I’m going to be sitting down with Y tomorrow, I’ll ask then”

I can’t help being amused by this because when you think about it, it’s a bit ridiculous – especially because in our (mostly sedentary, when we’re not hiking between office buildings or jetting about) daily work we do very little except sit down. We’re sitting down constantly – on commutes, at our desks, in meetings – and so whenever someone asks me if I’ve got time to sit down, I try hard to bite my tongue and refrain from smartarsing that I AM sitting down ALREADY, thankyouverymuch. Silly.

The other phrase, and the one which is sillier still, and yet seems much more prevelent (I’ve just heard Sarah Beeny use it in the course of her Property Stupidity Ladder show) is usually used in the context of people expressing an opinion or making a decision, or reflecting on a situation. They say:

“With your business hat on…”

or

“…with my European hat on, I’d recommend….”

or

“…wearing my technology hat for a minute, it looks like…”

I’ve heard of De Bono’s six thinking hats in creativity and innovation, but these are just ridiculous. The trouble is that all of this brings to my mind an image of actual hats.

In fact, I’m very tempted to make a business hat (bowler?), and a strategy hat (surely something with pockets?), and a European hat, and a consumer experience hat (a panama which always looks good even after a long-haul flight?), and an anthropologist hat (that’s a big one, floppy brim, perhaps with a notebook tucked in the headband?) and a geek hat (I’m picturing a wool beanie here, with a logo of some kind), and a social media hat (probably something hand-knitted from Peru, with earflaps) and in fact a hat for all occasions and roles I’m required to participate in or under, which I would then carry around (perhaps in a big bag) and pop them on whenever I was adopting that particular perspective or authority. That’d leave no room for doubt about which particular hat I was wearing when making any decisions, or attending any meetings, see?
I wonder what a European hat would look like?

Answers on a postcard…

Bookmark and Share

Category: Language, Overheard, Work, fmp

Tagged:

5 Responses

  1. GazH says:

    >I wonder what a European hat would look like?
    Blue, lots of stars and text on the rim: “We like the French really”.

  2. graybo says:

    As someone who deals with the EU frequently, I’d say that it would look like it had been designed by a committee.

  3. Gordon says:

    The real issue is… whoa…

    ohh my comment box just slide up the screen.. that was… odd… anyhoo.. as I was saying before I was so rudely interrupted (great, now my geek ‘hat’ is on and I’m thinking.. hmm Ajax?) the real issue is where these comments spring from.

    No, not THESE comments, THOSE comments wot those people say.

    In my office you can tell when a new ‘management’ book has done the rounds. All of a sudden we’re chasming or vortexing or ballerining (I may have made up that last one). It’s almost embarrasing.

    And every time I try and re-phrase what they are saying into, you know, good ole simple English *I* get the funny looks? No fair!

  4. Meredith says:

    my favorites:

    “smell check” just makes me think of the old finger sniff test that guys claim they did in college to see if a gir lwas “fresh” enough to go down on.

    “robust” no.. that it system is not as tasty as a salad dressing..

    “Sexy” unless our new marketing program involves half naked women.. i hate to tell you this but it’s NOT sexy.

    to bad your company uses sit down and not “pow-pow.” just think of the hats you could bring in for one of those!

  5. David says:

    Pet hates:
    “Going forward [from here, in future...]”
    “Please revert to me on this” …. Gawd, how that one annoys me!!

By way of explanation…

This is an individual post, which may not be very recent. For the latest stuff on meish dot org, please visit the main page.

By the way, I'm female. It doesn't have much impact on what I write about, or how I write, but I thought I'd point it out because so many people who link to this site seem to assume I'm male.

The clue's in the name: Meg. Like all those other female Megs.

Categories

What’s all this, then?

This is a personal site, created and curated continuously since early 2000 by Meg Pickard, a creative geek, passionate photographer, anthropologist and web experience /community /social media specialist, who works for The Guardian & lives in London, UK.
 
The site includes a blog - a personal and evolving collection of links, opinions, thoughts, ideas, anecdotes and musings - as well as a variety of other projects. It is also a place to aggregate some of the author's distributed web activity, like photos, links and music.
 
More info about this site and its author.

Important note #1

This is a personal site. The contents and opinions contained within don't necessarily reflect those of my employer, family, or cat. They think for themselves (though mostly about tuna, in at least one case), and so do I.

Important note #2

Since the overwhelming majority of content on this site is historical, it should be regarded in light of the context in which it was originally published, and not as indicative or revealing of current perspectives, preferences or experience.

Important note #3

While I work and spend a lot of time thinking and talking about social media, participatory technologies and community development strategies, the vast majority of content on this site is not about that.

This personal site isn't about anything, except the perpetual unfolding of one person's experience, and the perspectives, observations and opinions that involves and inspires.

You still here?

Oh.