meish dot org: life, unfolding

Icon

This is a blog by Meg Pickard. YMMV.
Hit the duck to be whisked to a random post

All photos » Someone call the trademark infringement team! How many patterns can one infant wear? High   We went for a long walk. Well, I did the walking; Erin mainly looked after the napping end of things We both need a nap Un entente cordial Work in progress I misread this: interchanged 'monk' and 'child' When you're only a few weeks old, space monkeys on a play gym arch are quite awesome Did my duty. Bit gloomy about the prospective results though, frankly. 8 weeks old, to the minute 

Monarch of the Grim

Oh dearie me. Not so long ago, I was saying that Monarch of the Glen is a guilty pleasure for a Sunday night. Well, I was wrong.

It was a cheesy pleasure, and now it’s unbearably poor.

The main problem is that it seems to have turned into a scottish version of an inner city hospital drama – McCasualty – a show in which various things happen, the script is ludicrously full of holes, and the whole plot is tied up genially within an hour-long episode. It’s so neat. It’s so planned. The show used to be all long-ranging plotlines, developing genial characters and shambolic antics in a jovial way, but this series demonstrates a new urgency to get each plotline tied up within the hour, in case the viewers don’t come back next week.

The BBC drama Casualty was a lot like that too, as far as I remember from watching it – though it’s been a good five years or so since I last saw an episode the whole way through. The thing about Casualty that always really bugged me was the sense of foreboding that seemed to hang over the establishing scenes in each episode.

There’s a woman picking up her kids from school. There’s a bloke at home making beans on toast. There’s an old lady trying to change a lighbulb. There’s a builder whistling on the way to work. By the end of the show, at least one of them will have flatlined, two others will be permanently disfigured, one more will have had a close shave and assorted others will have come into the Casualty department either bleeding from a gaping wound or in search of an injured relative.

Unlike ER, in which the plot revolves around the interactions of the hospital department staff, and those who come in injured or dying appear only fleetingly, in Casualty, the action is centred on the patients. As soon as someone not in a hospital uniform appears on screen, you know something nasty’s going to happen to them or someone close to them – it’s just a question of when.

See, they simply wouldn’t show the character unless they were about to become impaled on a fence or hit by a falling toilet or whatever. It’s all so foreboding – you feel (or at least I did) like shouting at the characters on screen “No! No! Don’t do it! Don’t leave the house! Go back to bed until the camera crew have gone!” but they never do.

So a while back, I came up with a plot device to make the whole thing a bit less doom-laden. What happens is that in every episode, you have the usual student going down to the shops, the bloke fixing his roof, the woman running for a bus, the family heading out for a picnic. Bad things will happen, oh yes, but one of these situations is a red herring.

So out of these four scenarios, three will end in blood and tears as usual, but one won’t. The trick is that the sense of foreboding will remain, but at the end of the episode you’ll see the family enjoying their picnic under a tree without the niggling feeling that they’re about to be struck by lightening or charged by an angry bull, or whatever.

So I pitched this to a Casualty script editor at a party in Southwark a few months ago, spurred on by a glass of wine. He seemed pretty receptive about it – but it’s possible that his enthusiasm was equally fuelled by his choice of tipple. In any case, if you see the changes come through in the way the programme is put together, remember: you read it hear first….

Bookmark and Share

Category: Rants, Television

Tagged:

Comments are closed.

By way of explanation…

This is an individual post, which may not be very recent. For the latest stuff on meish dot org, please visit the main page.

By the way, I'm female. It doesn't have much impact on what I write about, or how I write, but I thought I'd point it out because so many people who link to this site seem to assume I'm male.

The clue's in the name: Meg. Like all those other female Megs.

Categories

What’s all this, then?

This is a personal site, created and curated continuously since early 2000 by Meg Pickard, a creative geek, passionate photographer, anthropologist and web experience /community /social media specialist, who works for The Guardian & lives in London, UK.
 
The site includes a blog - a personal and evolving collection of links, opinions, thoughts, ideas, anecdotes and musings - as well as a variety of other projects. It is also a place to aggregate some of the author's distributed web activity, like photos, links and music.
 
More info about this site and its author.

Important note #1

This is a personal site. The contents and opinions contained within don't necessarily reflect those of my employer, family, or cat. They think for themselves (though mostly about tuna, in at least one case), and so do I.

Important note #2

Since the overwhelming majority of content on this site is historical, it should be regarded in light of the context in which it was originally published, and not as indicative or revealing of current perspectives, preferences or experience.

Important note #3

While I work and spend a lot of time thinking and talking about social media, participatory technologies and community development strategies, the vast majority of content on this site is not about that.

This personal site isn't about anything, except the perpetual unfolding of one person's experience, and the perspectives, observations and opinions that involves and inspires.

You still here?

Oh.